Why So Many Names?

Posted by James · Leave a Comment 

Chronicles is probably one of the last books of the Old Testament to have been written, most likely some time in the Fifth Century BC, decades after the Jews had first been allowed to return to the Promised Land from exile in Babylon. It covers much of the same historical period as Samuel and Kings, as we shall see. But the questions it is trying to answer are different. Those earlier books were trying to explain what had gone wrong, why the exile had happened. Chronicles sets out to answer questions like: Are we still God’s people? Do his covenants still hold? What is our relationship with the Israel of before the exile?

The genealogies at the beginning of Chronicles form part of the answer. They stress continuity with the past, and so an ongoing membership of God’s chosen people. They also embrace both the northern and southern tribes. Though there had been a split after Solomon, Chronicles likes to speak of ‘all Israel’.

Chronicles also presents an idealised version of the reigns of David and Solomon. Look out for what is missing from the equivalent accounts in Samuel and Kings. What we have here is a portrait of Messianic ideals, the kind of kingship that the Chronicler looks forward to from David’s descendant to come, the Messiah.

Kings and other rulers feature prominently in the closing chapters of Acts, as well. A running theme in the New Testament, both in Acts and some of the letters, is the relationship between the growing Christian movement and the ruling authorities. Are Christians a threat to law and order, or not? The enemies of the Christians often tried to portray them as a disruptive element in society (everywhere Paul goes, there are riots!). Perhaps a modern day equivalent is the charge that Christianity (and other religions, for that matter) is responsible for many of the wars of the last 2000 years. Paul had to defend his own actions 2000 years ago. What do we say to this charge today?

King and Country

Posted by James · 1 Comment 

After the reign of Solomon it seems pretty much downhill all the way for Israel and Judah. With a few exceptions, the kings either actively promote idolatry and the worship of pagan gods, or they simply let it happen without opposing it. And this puts the two kingdoms on a trajectory towards exile, as God had promised in the covenant made at Sinai. Time and again during this period we see how the king sets the tone for the kingdom. If the king will not remain faithful, then nor will the people (or at least most of them). They will follow where he leads. But there are some glimpses of hope:

  • God continues to call kings and people back to faithfulness through his spokesmen, prophets like Elijah and Elisha.
  • There is always a remnant who remain faithful, as Elijah finds out when he is at his most negative and desperate (see 1 Kings 19:18).
  • While Israel and Judah prove unfaithful, God remains faithful to his promises. Dynasties rise and fall in the northern kingdom of Israel, but in the southern kingdom of Judah, the line of David survives. What is needed is a king in the line of David who will prove faithful …

… the very king that Paul and others are busy proclaiming in the book of Acts. In fact, one way of summarising the gospel message, at least for Jewish listeners, is ‘that Jesus was the Christ’ (i.e. the anointed king promised by God). This is what Paul argues from the Scriptures when he is given the opportunity (see Acts 18:28).

Paul puts it differently for Gentiles, who wouldn’t know about the Jewish messiah (‘messiah’ and ‘Christ’ both mean ‘anointed one’, in Hebrew and Greek respectively). In Athens Paul puts his message like this - the God who made everything wants you to repent of worshipping idols and reach out to him, because he will judge the world, and the judge has now been appointed (Acts 17). How would we put that message today – the same message, in language that people in our 21st culture can understand?

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes